Understanding the differences between Ripple (XRP) vs Stellar Lumens (XLM) is a crucial step in familiarizing yourself with the blockchain sector. Both of these projects have a strong community following and other characteristics they share in common. That being said, there are still many differences between the platforms that make each uniquely suited for their specific purposes.
What is Ripple?
Ripple (XRP) is the cryptocurrency used by banks to interact with the Ripple network. The Ripple Net is comprised of the Ripple Foundation, developers, and a variety of well-known financial institutions. What makes Ripple different, and why it has always been a bit of a black sheep among early crypto projects, is the fact that it’s designed to serve the central banking community.
Ripple functions as global payments network specifically designed to streamline international financial transactions between Ripple Net participants. This group is comprised of mostly banks but there are some other notable financial institutions, such as Money Gram, that have joined the team to leverage Ripple’s real-time gross settlement system, currency exchange, and remittance network.
What is Stellar Lumens?
Stellar Lumens (XLM) is a cryptocurrency designed to facilitate the same style of cross-border transactions as Ripple, albeit to a slightly different crowd. Stellar Lumens is geared primarily to enterprise clientele, although it also works with banks and financial institutions. The project is backed by a non-profit called the Stellar Development Foundation (SDF). This group focuses on expanding the Stellar Lumens’ ecosystem and securing new strategic partnerships.
A Shared History
The similarities in these two projects are not some random occurrence. Many are surprised to learn that the projects share a developer, Jeb McCaleb. Here’s how the Ripple concept helped spawn one of its biggest competitors, Stellar Lumens, into existence.
Ripple (XRP) vs Stellar Lumens (XLM) Company Histories
Ripple (XRP) officially launched in 2012 to moderate market hype. This was the early days of the market as Bitcoin was only three years old. Notably, XRP was the first bank-focused cryptocurrency. As such, it was seen by many long-time crypto users as a bit of a sell-out during those early years. Remember, Bitcoin was developed to free people from the same system that Ripple was designed to serve.
However, Ripple was anything but a sellout. If anything, it was ahead of the curve. The reality is the project has helped spur blockchain adoption in many ways. Currently, the platform supports tokens representing fiat currencies, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and more.
Notably, Ripple is a privately owned for-profit firm. The platform’s developments are decided on by the members of the Ripple Foundation and its development team. Interestingly, during Ripples launch, 1 billion XRP were pre-mined. These tokens have been slowly released into the network via a few major investors.
Ripple was founded by a group of long-time blockchain developers. Specifically, the concept was conceived by Ryan Fugger and led by Jed McCaleb and Chris Larsen. All have a long vibrant history in the sector. McCaleb has been a pioneering force in the market since its early days. He is best known for starting the now-defunct Mt.Gox cryptocurrency exchange.
Larsen was the founder of a number of successful FinTech startups including E-Loan, which he later sold to Banco Popular. The group also recruited Arthur Britto and David Schwartz to assist in building the project. Interestingly, Ripple (XRP) originally entered the market under the name OpenCoin on April 11, 2013. In September of the same year, the group officially rebranded to Ripple Labs.
Ripples Turn to Waves
As Ripple began to expand its network, a rift began to become evident among some of its core developers. Specifically, McCaleb began to express concerns about the project’s overall direction. According to inside sources, there were multiple instances where his concepts and ideas were shot down by the rest of the Ripple development team.
Stellar Lumens (XLM) is Born
These concerns led to McCaleb splitting for Ripple in 2014 and launching his own international payments network called Stellar Lumens. Notably, the split wasn’t amicable as McCaleb began to dump his billions of XRP. This decision led to Ripple filing a lawsuit to block him from tanking the market value of the coin.
Stellar Lumens officially entered the market in 2014. The project was co-founded by McCaleb and former lawyer, Joyce Kim. Stellar Lumen’s main functionalities are very similar to Ripple, with a few changes. XLM, the platform’s utility token, was built to provide an easy way for enterprise clientele to create, send, and trade digital representations of all forms of money.
A Well-Funded Launch
Stellar Lumens received major market support during its early funding stages. The network secured funding from Stripe CEO, Patrick Collison, WordPress Founder, Matt Mullenweg, and AngelList Founder, Naval. Notably, Stripe received 2 billion XLM for its seed funding of the project.
Ripple (XRP) vs Stellar Lumens (XLM) Mechanics
When you look at the technical structure of these networks it’s easier to see all the differences. For one, XLM has no cap on its supply, whereas, XRP is set at 100,000,000,000. However, the majority of Ripple is held by its development team at this time. The firm releases these coins at a rate of 1 billion a month. Notably, only around 10%-30% enter service with the majority going into an escrow account. Users can track these issuances via the xrpL.
Ripple (XRP) vs Stellar Lumens (XLM) Consensus Mechanisms
The Ripple Consensus mechanism relies on six components. There are servers running Ripple Server software, a distributed ledger, a last-closed, ledger, and an open ledger. The ledger holds the value of all user’s accounts. The last closed ledger is the most recent version of the ledger and the open ledger is the ledger’s current operating status.
There is also a Unique Node List (UNL). This is a set of other server queries used during validation. Lastly, a Proposer is any server broadcasting transactions to be included in the consensus process. The Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm (RPCA) is applied every few seconds by all nodes, in order to maintain the correctness and agreement of the network.
The main advantage of Ripple’s DLT is that it’s extremely scalable. The platform can handle around 1,500 transactions per second (tps) currently. This scalability also improves transaction fees. The network’s standard transaction fee averages out to 0.00001 XRP per transaction.
Stellar Consensus Protocol (SCP)
The Stellar Consensus Protocol was first published in 2015 by David Mazières. The document laid out how the SCP could secure a decentralized network in an efficient manner without sacrificing performance. The SCP relies on a combination of digital signatures and hash families to validate the state of the network. Unlike Ripple’s closed network, anyone can become a validator, archiver node, or horizon server on Stellar Lumens’ blockchain.
The SCP provides extremely low latency. The network has been stressed tested to +1000 tps. This test was conducted with 1-billion accounts operating on the ledger. In this way, Stellar Lumens provides enterprise clientele a reliable and secure means to conduct international transactions.
Ripple vs Stellar Lumens Regulatory Concerns
Ripple is currently in the midst of an SEC court battle. The SEC has alleged Ripple unlawfully sold securities during its XRP ICO. According to the most recent reports, the firm is prepared to argue “The Fair Notice” defense. This strategy argues the firm had no reasonable fair notice from the SEC on whether selling XRP would constitute an illegal securities offering.
Why the Ripple Case is Pivotal
If Ripple (XRP) is successful in its argument, the effects would have a “ripple” effect throughout the industry. Moving forward, the SEC would have to prove they warned ICOs that their efforts could be considered illegal to impose harsh fines. Speaking on the company’s future plans, Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlighaus has stated that his firm intends to consider going public following the resolution of the SEC lawsuit.
Stellar (XLM) – A Smooth Ride
Of course, the experience and insight gained by McCaleb during his stent at Ripple paid off greatly in terms of regulatory concerns. To date, Stellar has managed to remain out of the SEC’s crosshairs. Notably, the platform even received regulatory approval from the New York Department of Financial Services to be listed.
Stellar Goes Hyper
This month, Stellar Lumens raised eyebrows across the market when it announced that it had partnered with VISA, Tala, and Circle, one of the companies behind USDC, to create a new decentralized ecosystem. The team will create a new stablecoin and wallet that will enable users to make cross-border transactions and access fiat to crypto services.
For its part, VISA intends to issue cards that are directly linked to the wallets. These cards will enable users to spend their crypto anywhere that accepts VISA. Currently, VISA’s network consists of +70 million merchants globally.
Where to buy Ripple & Stellar Lumens
These are two of the most popular cryptocurrencies in the world. The exchanges below enable the purchase of both of these digital assets.
Binance – Best for Australia, Canada, Singapore, UK and most of the world. USA residents are prohibited from many of the tokens on this platform. Use Discount Code: EE59L0QP for 10% cashback off all trading fees.
BitPanda – This is the best option for European residents. Please note they do not accept residents from outside of this region.
Kraken – This is the best option for USA residents.
Paybis – The simplest platform, if you simply want to buy XRP or XLM and hold then this is one of the easiest ways to buy XRP. USA residents are welcome excluding the states of Hawaii & New York.
Ripple (XRP) and Stellar Lumens (XLM) – Depends on Your Goals
In terms of what project is a better investment, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Both firms have managed to secure some impressive strategic partnerships and both projects have a lot of pilot programs currently underway. For these reasons, both networks could be considered long-term investments.